Codenstuff.com

A technological environmental free society should be built by the foundation of exchange, value, and services, individuals do/share upon one another. Not a centralized structure that uses symbols to represent these fundamental values, which in time eventually turns their back on the concepts that made these great technological nations an amazing piece of history. We need to stop the fundamental construction of the rule of law and treat disorders as if they are disorders, but to never forget the fundamental concept of freedom of choice. If one makes a choice, knows its bad, but isn't willing to better oneself based on that choice then consultation (not justification) is a variable in the equation. Never the less these actions should be agreed upon in a public council. Secrecy and the rule of law is not the way to the heavens, and eventually demises the vary central structure that it was created upon. We must never forget to love one another, and never
forget to tell those you care about you love them. Either upon arrival, departure, or current events. However one or a whole views it is irrelevant. The point is to let those you care about know it and you show it. It does not need to justify its reasoning because one simply doesn't understand the simplistic core value of love and coexistence.

World peace will not happen through a monetary structure of an economic society. First we must accomplish free unlimited energy, which we already have we just need to harness it in a way that's more usable to us. Then there will be no need for banks, politics, or borders. Just services. Sure banking is a service, but is it really needed? The only reason it still exists is because were mirrored with the illusion that politics gives us the idea of freedom of choice, but we don't need politics. We need communities sustaining communities. Why put faith in a monetary system when it doesn't even care about you, the same goes with law. Power is not justice, it's a disorder, and to be treated as such. I'm talking simply physics, not expectation, or intention. As you only intend to do something you're not living, breathing, or talking about it. Sure you may know it, but I can not change the frequency of reality you prefer as realization. Only YOU can do that! So shift to the one you prefer and the results will show. This is not a note to all, just those that need this message. REMEMBER Emotion is only an expression of yourself, your spirit. The results show based on what you express the most.

If you haven't already read it, please take time to read the Physics of The Physiological Body.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CO2 is not the problem!!!! It is not a pollutant.

Take time to watch these two videos. Remember scientists are people too, and work to make a profit like most of us simply to make living. The monetary system is the biggest problem. Not global warming. The people need too be educated on energy itself. The Space/Time Antenna would solve this problem and it's 100% efficiency. We've (being the human species) have had free energy multiple times in the past. I'm sure some of youu heard of Nicola Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower which was created and demolished in the early 1900's by JP Morgan simply because he couldn't find a way to make a profit out of it, and Tesla wanted it free for everyone. Take some time to research further into this before judging.

Now take some time throughout the day and actually view the world around you. Plastic cars, bags, bottles, containers, etc: etc: Plastic/Oil is a multi billion dollar organization. The Bush family is well know for their Oil industry. If CO2 was really a big problem then why would this continue to be pushed? If it was really a big problem wouldn't there be a recall on it like salmonella? There's a BIGGER conspiracy gong on that a lot of individuals aren't even aware of.

How about you take time to watch these videos before commenting? The truth is right in front of you even on the money you use, but fail to see the vision hidden behind the currency. If you think this is a bunch of bull and I'm nothing more than a illusionist. You're living in a land of oz, the matrix, and the only way to break free of it is to acknowledge it's existence, know who you are in creation, be aware of creation, and then prolong from there, or continue to function at the lower frequency of centralized governance and believe the disillusions brought upon a few to many upon these nations.

Other topics I posted related to this...
Free Energy From Em Waves - My Results
The Unified Current
Magnetic Motor and Electromagnetism
God and The Unified Field Theory!
Physics of the Physiological Body!

You said that once we can harness that 'unlimited energy', all we would ever need would be services. But what about resources? Where would we get them? Global Warming is a major issue nowadays, and if we get unlimited energy, then there will be a huge increase in the number of industries and factories. Won't they make pollution a major issue? And what about the ozone layer? And the resources? Plant population and other natural resources such as various minerals, aren't they limited? They do regenerate but that is a matter of many centuries. Plants, too, don't grow on their own. At least they won't grow fast enough to replace the ones being cut everyday.

We're getting unlimited energy here, not unlimited resources. We can reduce the carbon dioxide emissions by replacing the combustion processes with electricity (go green) but we can't reduce other sources of pollution.

Usman55 wrote:

You said that once we can harness that 'unlimited energy', all we would ever need would be services. But what about resources? Where would we get them? Global Warming is a major issue nowadays, and if we get unlimited energy, then there will be a huge increase in the number of industries and factories. Won't they make pollution a major issue? And what about the ozone layer? And the resources? Plant population and other natural resources such as various minerals, aren't they limited? They do regenerate but that is a matter of many centuries. Plants, too, don't grow on their own. At least they won't grow fast enough to replace the ones being cut everyday.

We're getting unlimited energy here, not unlimited resources. We can reduce the carbon dioxide emissions by replacing the combustion processes with electricity (go green) but we can't reduce other sources of pollution.

ok first off bro, you really need to do more research on these topics before you state what you perceive is a fact like "Global Warming", which is just another concept to increase profit, and maintain control.

Here's four sources I thought of right away as soon as I saw that statement, You are looking at this the wrong way...

Usman55 wrote:

Plant population and other natural resources such as various minerals, aren't they limited?

A wise man once said, “Using no way as way. Having no limitation as limitation” - Bruce Lee

“Using no way as way” means do not presuppose a way. Be in the moment. Be present. Be open to the best way to meet the moment in which you find yourself, rather than planning before hand what way will be best.

“Having no limitation as limitation” means keep an open mind. Do not limit yourself or your thinking. Do not let your beliefs or your style limit your experience.

Today we have people mow lawns so they can get money, and make a living. This wouldn't necessarily stop, but land would be shared. Some communities already do this, but when a false icon of value goes away then true value arises. Respect, honor, trust, knowledge, etc: It sounds to me you haven't researched into topics related to this. Recycling would be an aspect enforced. No need to continue drilling. We have plenty of dumps full of plastic, steel, etc: I live right by the Rock River which is #7 for most polluted waterways in the country in 2010, and Illinois is #1. I've found bikes in the river, I've found steel bars, pop cans, among many many other things. This isn't just people, it's also toxic dumping of nuclear waste. When I was little my and met my grandma she had a garden, in her home. The plants filtered the water, and cleaned the air. We breathe in oxygen, and breath out carbon dioxide. Trees take in the carbon dioxide, and release oxygen. We don't need to be using trees for paper or wood. For thousands of years hemp was used for industrial purposes. The declaration of independence, the united states constitution, bother were printed out of hemp, George Bush Sr's parachute in WW2 was made out of hemp, Henry Fords first couple vehicles were made out of hemp, as well as Rudolf Diesel's first couple cars were designed to run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp; he actually ran the thing on peanut oil for the 1900 World's Fair. Henry Ford used hemp to not only construct cars but also fuel them. I can go on and on. Not to mention it's herbal remedy capabilities. Even dandelions, but people are even disillusioned on that, "That's a weed, get it out of here". Yet it's one of the most popular, and easy to find medicinal plants/herbs out there.

Anything can be abused. Not just drugs, power, drilling, etc: ANYTHING even porn. So before you believe these asinine statements brought out to increase more profit. Please look into it. I can't even begin to talk about frequencies and vibrations here until you do further research.

So this is a lie? Or a coincidence?

Multiple sources state that the planets are heating up and increase sun activity has been recorded. Comparing now then 10-20+ years ago we have less trees then before. Which will increase CO2 as that's what trees/plants inhale. What we inhale is what they exhale being oxygen. So lie or coincidence? I would say a combination of the two, but you haven't shown enough data to state your conclusion on global warming. I listed a few above in my original post, and can gather plenty more, but its irrelevant. Clearly our energy use today is being abused with oil from plastics, styrofoam, dumps, etc: my grandma told one when she was a kid they didnt have these problems. They used glass bottles and they would return it to the store to be recycled. They had payphones, and vehicles weren't easily breakable like they are now with these plastic cars.

I remember reading some studies on the old television sets compared to the new digital ones and how the UV light emitted from the television screen (or computer) has more people now with blurry vision than those that stuck with the older television sets that use a digital converter box, but then again people have gotten skin rashes from wifi emittions as well. The point is someone will always have a problem with whatever that is, but statistically we can recycle more and emit less by using free energy solutions. So we can save what we really need for whatever we may need it for.

I am now confused as to what are you opposed to. If you think that the Earth is heating up solely because of the Sun and greenhouse gasses had nothing to do with it, and you think the graph i have posted is incorrect, please reference alternative measurements by a reputable source.
Also I don't think you'd go around disproving the concept of the greenhouse effect. CO2 levels are increasing, which you can
measure yourself for about 200$ (portable sensor) an some time. CFCs/Freons are known with certainty to be catalysts for chemical decomposition of ozon and do not appear naturally.
I think you would also agree that developing new technology that would set us independent of fossil fuels (such as ITER, http://www.iter.org/) would reduce the amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere relative to changing nothing.
Entire part of science studying climate change is pushing towards this, i don''t see where this conflicts with your ideas and where the conspiracy would lie.

Some data you requested:


Relative change of temperature in 50 years, NASA, http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=42392 - further references there


land/ocean temperatures, NASA, http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/ - further references there


CO2 levels, NASA, http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence - further references there


solar irradiance, Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos (world radiation center), http://www.pmodwrc.ch/pmod.php?topic=ts ... arConstant - further references there

CO2 is not the problem!!!! You make it sound like a pollutant and it's not.

Take time to watch these two videos. Remember scientists are people too, and work to make a profit like most of us simply to make living. The monetary system is the biggest problem. Not global warming. The people need too be educated on energy itself. The Space/Time Antenna would solve this problem and it's 100% efficiency. We've (being the human species) have had free energy multiple times in the past. I'm sure you'd heard of Nicola Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower which was created and demolished in the early 1900's by JP Morgan simply because he couldn't find a way to make a profit out of it, and Tesla wanted it free for everyone. Take some time to research further into this before judging. Other then just researching enough simply to state your opinion. Additionally I don't want you or anyone to think in anyway shape or form that I'm "attacking" you with this information. I can clearly see where you stand on this debate that's why I gather these sources so you can see it for yourself, and YOU can do further research into this topic.

Now take some time throughout the day and actually view the world around you. Plastic cars, bags, bottles, containers, etc: etc: Plastic/Oil is a multi billion dollar organization. The Bush family is well know for their Oil industry. If CO2 was really a big problem then why would this continue to be pushed? If it was really a big problem wouldn't there be a recall on it like salmonella? There's a BIGGER conspiracy gong on that I don't think you're even aware of. Why do I say that? Because of how you continued to respond based on this simple topic.

How about you take time to watch these videos before commenting? The truth is right in front of you even on the money you use, but fail to see the vision hidden behind the currency. If you think this is a bunch of bull and I'm nothing more than a illusionist. You're living in a land of oz, the matrix, and the only way to break free of it is to acknowledge it's existence, know who you are in creation, be aware of creation, and then prolong from there, or continue to function at the lower frequency of centralized governance and believe the disillusions brought upon a few to many upon these nations.

What do you mean with "It's not a pollutant"?
Do you mean that it does not cause/contribute to the greenhouse effect or that (for example) "CO2 + H2O <=> H2CO3" (acid rain) doesn't happen? As I said before, you can measure it yourself and observe the levels slowly rising over the years.

I know a few scientists (depends on your definition though) and I can assure you that they deem truth before all else, which is why they studied years and explored their field in the first place. (also they aren't exactly rolling in money)

Also take into the account that politicians often can't agree on most trivial of issues, I find it highly unlikely that an absolutely massive scam, unblown for a century it taking place.